![]() |
| Liz Perelstein's response to the May 22nd article in The New York Times: |
Yesterday’s New York Times
exposed yet another story about abuse of public funds intended to support
greater educational opportunities for needy children. The sad irony of
what has taken on the moniker “School Choice” movement is one I think about a
great deal, because I own and run a business coincidentally called The School
Choice Group, which helps families to find the right schools for their children
all over the world.
While we are apolitical and not related to the various “school choice” movements springing up around the country (we predate them by more than a decade), The School Choice Group is founded on the belief that not all children are best served by the same type of education, and that a child educated in a school that is academically and personally compatible for him or her will thrive.
In addition to the potential benefit of additional school options, reflecting the fact that each child is unique with his or her own strengths and weaknesses, I personally believe that creating competition within the education sector can result in innovation, creativity and enthusiasm. The abuse of an idea that could benefit children and society because it has been taken over by extremists and used for political and religious purposes is appalling. Using public funds intended to benefit needy children and to equalize educational opportunity, as described in this article, takes inexcusable to another level – might I say scandalous?
While we are apolitical and not related to the various “school choice” movements springing up around the country (we predate them by more than a decade), The School Choice Group is founded on the belief that not all children are best served by the same type of education, and that a child educated in a school that is academically and personally compatible for him or her will thrive.
In addition to the potential benefit of additional school options, reflecting the fact that each child is unique with his or her own strengths and weaknesses, I personally believe that creating competition within the education sector can result in innovation, creativity and enthusiasm. The abuse of an idea that could benefit children and society because it has been taken over by extremists and used for political and religious purposes is appalling. Using public funds intended to benefit needy children and to equalize educational opportunity, as described in this article, takes inexcusable to another level – might I say scandalous?
The greatest irony of all is found in the last
paragraph of the article. The Headmaster of the Covenant Christian
Academy is quoted as saying “You have to keep in mind that the curriculum goes
beyond the textbook.” Doesn’t “beyond the textbook” include what parents,
teachers and school officials teach children through their actions?

